|
|
The undecided minerThe last time Q&M visited Newmont in Waihi two years ago we came away with a story about the final closure of Martha and community relations. HUGH DE LACY returns to find the company facing a serious challenge from residents demanding a clear idea of the mining company’s intentions.
It’s a problem arising from the widely-held local perception that, after buying the old Martha Pit mine from fellow global giant Normandy Mining in February 2002, Newmont would have shut up shop, filled the hole with water and beautified it with landscaping by the end of 2006, and pretty little Waihi – population 4500 – would have started a new life as a tourist destination on the banks of a lovely man-made lake. Now Newmont Waihi Gold is evaluating an eastern layback at Martha that could extend the pit’s life to at least 2013, and is spending between $8 million and $11 million a year on exploration that could result in its stay in the eastern Bay of Plenty being extended indefinitely. Blame it on the steadily rising global price of gold and the richness of the pickings in this corner of Hauraki District, but many of the otherwise tolerant citizens of Waihi are suffering from what they describe as “the mirage of closure”.
What would be left behind, aside from the landscaped lake – which itself might create subsidence problems from the re-watering – would be a $21 million legacy to the district’s mining history in the form of a tourist-oriented Gold Discovery Centre, funded jointly by Newmont, the New Zealand Mint, the Ministry of Economic Development and the Hauraki District Council. The event which has, more than any other, created the mirage of closure so disconcerting was Newmont’s signalling in September 2007 that it was intending a cutback on the western side of the Martha Pit. Even though the company decided against it in June the following year without getting as far as making an application for resource consent, this was the first confirmation many had that, far from closing, the pit operation looked set to continue – as indeed it has on the other side of the hole. While declining to give any firm date for the closure of Martha, Newmont this year offered four scenarios for its continued presence in and around Waihi.
The second scenario, “under feasibility,” sees the eastern layback keeping the pit operating until 2013, with the filling of the lake completed by 2019, the milling and water treatment ceasing in 2014, and the tailing facilities closed in 2016. The third option, “exploration,” foresees a new underground mine within the current mining footprint postponing the completion of the lake filling until 2022, with the milling and water treatment continuing until 2017, and the closure of the tailings facility two years later. The fourth scenario, “Regional Exploration,” offers no timelines, just the continued targeting of underground deposits within 100 kilometres of Waihi. Waihi residents’ frustration over the mirage of closure is currently expressed through the Distressed Residents Action Team (DRAT), formed back in 2001 in response to the Barry Road subsidence when in December 2001 when the ground opened up and swallowed a house in Barry Road and forced the evacuation of 25 people from 12 houses, two of which were destroyed and the rest of which had to be re-located.
A lifetime resident of Waihi, Spalding told Q&M that when mining of the Martha Pit recommenced in 1987 after a 35-year lay-off, the community was given “finite timeframes” for a 10-year operation. The original New Zealand owners subsequently sold the mine to Normandy, which went on to gain an extension to its mining permit that put closure off until 2007. Newmont seemed to confirm that closure date after it bought out Normandy in 2002 but began hinting at unspecified extensions about four years ago. Spalding, who had a decade earlier bought a home affected by the blasting in anticipation of it ceasing, felt cheated. “You buy in good faith based on the information available at the time, only to find everybody else in town is laughing at you because they never believed for a moment the mine [company] was going anywhere,” she says. Newmont Waihi chief executive Glen Grindlay offers sympathy and regret for the current uncertainty, but says the future of the company and mining in Waihi is dependent on the results of ongoing exploration – “and it’s not really the sort of thing you can predict. We’ve said before this is a country of choice for us, and it’s a great district so we’d like to stay here as long as we possibly can.”
The only consolation he can offer is Newmont Waihi’s proven record of community involvement, no less than its environmental sensitivities. “People shouldn’t focus on the ‘what’ that we do: it’s on ‘how’ we do it – and that’s where we’d like to see the debate.” Q&M Vol.6 No.6 December 2009-January 2010 All articles on this website are copyright to Contrafed Publishing Co. Ltd. |